Should You Stay, Switch, or Start?

Right now, 62% of people globally are not engaged at work. Another 15% are actively disengaged. Only 23% are truly engaged, according to Gallup’s 2024 State of the Global Workplace report. In the U.S., engagement has sunk to a decade low, with only 31% engaged and 17% actively disengaged. If you feel a persistent restlessness about your career, you are statistically normal. The problem is not you. The problem is likely a mismatch you have not diagnosed.

For women, the data is more specific. For every woman at the director level who gets promoted, two are voluntarily leaving their company. McKinsey and LeanIn call this “The Great Breakup,” and it signals that waiting for a company to catch up to your potential is no longer a default strategy. The primary reasons women leaders switch jobs are lack of advancement (48%), unsupportive managers (22%), and unmanageable workload (17%). These are structural problems, not personal failures. Nearly half of women report feeling burnt out.

Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman’s Prospect Theory explains why leaving is so hard. The psychological pain of a loss registers at roughly twice the intensity of an equivalent gain. When you consider walking away from years of investment, your brain isn’t doing rational math. It is trying to avoid the sharp, certain pain of admitting a loss. This is the sunk cost fallacy, and it keeps intelligent people in wrong-fit roles for years.

The standard advice is to figure out what you want, then go get it. Herminia Ibarra, a professor at London Business School, argues this is backwards. In her research for Working Identity, she found that knowing is the result of doing and experimenting. You change careers by testing possible selves, not through introspection alone.

This quiz uses that research. It does not ask what you dream of doing. It asks how you react to your current work reality. Your answers will point to one of three paths: staying and actively repositioning your role, switching to a new industry, or starting your own venture.

Eight questions. Under two minutes. The answer will be direct.

You’ve been in your role for a few years. When someone asks why you stay, your most honest answer is…

“I’ve put too much in to walk away now.”
“I’m still learning and gaining something useful.”
“The people, mostly. The work itself is fine.”
“Honestly? I’m not sure anymore.”

You picture doing your same type of work, but at a completely different company. Your gut says…

That actually sounds refreshing.
I’d just be trading one set of problems for another.
Excited. The problem might be this place, not the work.
Indifferent. The company isn’t the issue.

The parts of your job that give you energy are usually things you…

Had to quietly carve out for yourself.
Get officially recognised and rewarded for.
Do outside of work, in a side project or volunteer role.
Just get through so you can focus on your life outside.

When you hear about a colleague who left to start their own business, you feel…

A sharp pang of envy.
Respect, but also relief it’s not me.
Curious about how they did it.
Nothing much. It’s not my path.

Your last good idea got shut down. Your first thought was…

Maybe I should take this somewhere else.
How can I repackage this for a different audience here?
This place doesn’t value what I bring.
Fine. One less thing to worry about.

If you could redesign your role completely — same company, same pay — you’d be…

Energised. I know exactly what I’d change.
Bored. The core work is the problem.
Interested, but doubtful they’d ever allow it.
Confused. I wouldn’t know where to start.

Think about your industry as a whole, not just your company. You feel…

Aligned with its purpose and the people it serves.
Like it’s a vehicle for my skills, nothing more.
Increasingly disconnected from its values.
Indifferent. It’s just where I ended up.

You have a valuable skill your current role doesn’t use or reward. You…

Use it in side projects that feel more ‘you’.
Accept it. Work doesn’t have to be everything.
Try to sneak it into my existing responsibilities.
Get frustrated. It feels like a waste.

Stay & Reposition

Your score suggests leaving feels like a loss you’re not ready to lock in. That’s classic loss aversion — the brain weighing potential gain as half as powerful as a certain loss. The cost is you might be over-investing in a sinking asset. Your first step isn’t to quit. It’s to run a job-crafting experiment: redesign one task or relationship this month. Research shows that changing how you work can change how you feel about it.

Switch Industries

Your restlessness is specific. You’re not bored with work; you’re mismatched with your field or company culture. This aligns with the data: 48% of women leaders leave primarily due to lack of advancement. The cost of switching is starting over in seniority, but the gain is alignment. Your first step is what Herminia Ibarra calls ‘shifting connections.’ Have one coffee with someone in a field you’re curious about. Test a possible self before you commit.

Start Your Own

Your energy comes from what you build, not what you maintain. This isn’t a fantasy; it’s a data point. Women-owned businesses grew 21% in five years, more than double the average. The cost is trading predictable stress for unpredictable chaos. Your first step is the smallest possible experiment. Sell one service, write one proposal, or build one prototype—not as a side hustle, but as a test of a working identity. Don’t plan your exit. Prototype it.

More Quizzes
Are You Managing Up — Or Just Managing?First Job Survival QuizHow Visible Is Your Work?What’s Your Leadership Archetype?

What Your Result Means

Stay & Reposition
You scored here because your dissatisfaction is tied to your specific role or company, not your entire field. The research compiled by Careershifters shows 75% of people are more satisfied after a change, but a full-scale leap may be unnecessary. Your restlessness may stem from a mismatch in work orientation. Amy Wrzesniewski’s research finds people see work as a job, a career, or a calling. You might have a calling orientation in a role that treats it as just a job. Her job crafting framework is your toolkit. It means proactively reshaping your job by altering your tasks, changing who you work with, or reframing how you see your work’s purpose. The cost of not doing this is slow disengagement—becoming part of the 62% who are psychologically unattached. This week, write down three tasks you enjoy and three you dread. For one dreaded task, draft one sentence on how you could delegate it, automate it, or stop doing it without asking permission first.

Switch Industries
You scored here because your core issue is with the industry itself—its purpose, culture, or fundamental mechanics. The problem is not your manager or your title. A 2023 McKinsey report found that unsupportive managers and unmanageable workloads are top reasons women leave, but if you imagine doing the same work at a different company and feel nothing, the field is the problem. The real-world cost is burnout that follows you from job to job. Herminia Ibarra’s research suggests you cannot think your way into a new industry. You must test it. Your action this week is not to update your CV. It is to find one person on LinkedIn who works in a field you are curious about and send a brief, specific message asking about a typical Tuesday. Do not ask for a job. Ask for a description.

Start Your Own
You scored here because your energy comes from creating things that don’t yet exist in your current structure. This is not an escape from a bad job. It is a pull toward building something. The data from the National Association of Women Business Owners shows there are over 13 million women-owned businesses in the U.S. alone, a segment growing significantly faster than the market average. The cost of ignoring this signal is resentment and a growing sense that you are using only a fraction of your capability. Ibarra’s model calls this “crafting experiments.” Your task this week is not to write a business plan. It is to spend one hour doing a piece of work you would do in that hypothetical venture—design a logo, write a product description, calculate what you would charge one client. The goal is to test the work itself, not the idea.

How to Move Forward, Based on the Research

Separate loss aversion from real risk. Daniel Kahneman’s work shows we feel losses twice as powerfully as gains. When you think about leaving, the feeling of “wasting” your past investment is a cognitive bias, not a financial analysis. Calculate the actual risk: what is the minimum savings you need to cover six months of expenses? Write that number down. Then calculate the cost of staying: estimate the annual salary increase you are missing by being in a stagnant role. Seeing both numbers side-by-side makes the bias less powerful.

Test a possible self through a side project. Herminia Ibarra’s central finding is that career change happens by doing, not by planning. If you are considering a switch or a start-up, your next step is not more research. It is a small, low-stakes experiment. Volunteer for a committee that uses different skills. Write one article on a topic in the new field. Do a freelance project for a friend’s business. If your experiment involves client meetings, consider what you would wear; our guide on business casual has examples. The goal is to experience the work and gather data on whether you like the reality, not the idea.

Conduct a job crafting audit. If your result suggested you stay and reposition, use Amy Wrzesniewski’s framework. Take a sheet of paper and draw three columns: Tasks, Relationships, Purpose. Under Tasks, list everything you do. Circle three you want to do more of and three you want to stop or change. For Relationships, note who you interact with. Identify one person or department you could engage with more to make your work more meaningful. Under Purpose, write one sentence about how your work helps someone. Then write a new sentence that reframes a mundane task into that purpose. This is not about asking for a new job title. It is about redesigning the job you have.

Use your network as a sensor, not a safety net. If you are considering an industry switch, your current network will likely reinforce your current identity. Ibarra emphasises the need to build “shifting connections.” Identify two professional associations, online communities, or event series outside your field. Join one and observe the conversations for two weeks. Do not post. Listen. The language they use and the problems they discuss will tell you more about fit than any job description.

Benchmark your situation against the data, not your feelings. When you feel stalled, check it against the structural numbers. McKinsey’s 2024 report shows that for every 100 men promoted to manager, only 81 women are promoted. For Black women, it is 54. If you are waiting for a promotion that never comes, the problem may be the broken rung, not your performance. This does not mean you must leave. It means your strategy must account for the structure, not just your effort.

Define what “enough” looks like for a start-up. The fantasy of starting something is often limitless. The reality requires boundaries. Before you romanticise entrepreneurship, define the minimum viable outcome. Is it replacing 30% of your income within two years? Is it having three committed clients? Is it working no more than 50 hours a week? Write down three concrete, modest metrics for success. If you cannot achieve those under test conditions, the full-scale venture will not solve your problem.

Diagnose your work orientation. Amy Wrzesniewski’s research categorises work as a job, a career, or a calling. Your dissatisfaction might come from a mismatch. Read the descriptions of each orientation. Which one fits you now? Which one do you want? A person with a calling orientation in a job-focused workplace will feel stifled. Knowing this can clarify whether you need to craft your current role, switch environments, or build your own. This framework shows orientation is not tied to job title.

Run a sunk cost experiment. Researchers Hal Arkes and Catherine Blumer found people stick with bad investments just because they’ve already paid. They called it the sunk cost fallacy. To counter it, conduct a thought experiment: imagine you never took your current job or studied your field. With no past investment, what would you do? Write down the first three ideas. This separates genuine interest from your brain’s aversion to loss. The original experiment showed people chose a less enjoyable ski trip because they’d paid more for it. Don’t let your past costs dictate your future.

Sources

Gallup. (2024). State of the Global Workplace: 2024 Report. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.Org. (2024). Women in the Workplace 2024: The 10th Anniversary Report. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace

Ibarra, H. (2023). Working Identity: Unconventional Strategies for Reinventing Your Career (Updated ed.). Harvard Business Review Press. https://herminiaibarra.com/working-identity-book/

Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011

Avatar photo
Anne

Anne is the lead style editor at MemoryCreator with over 10 years of experience navigating strict corporate dress codes in the German banking sector. Having spent a decade in business casual and formal office environments, she specializes in translating confusing HR dress codes into highly functional, reality-tested wardrobes.

Unlike traditional fashion stylists, Anne approaches workwear with a strict "reality check" methodology. She evaluates clothing based on comfort, durability, and true office appropriateness rather than fleeting trends. Every outfit guide she writes is designed to solve the everyday panic of getting dressed for client meetings, job interviews, or a standard Tuesday morning at the desk.

At MemoryCreator, Anne writes comprehensive office style guides, capsule wardrobe breakdowns, and honest reviews of mid-range workwear brands. Her ultimate goal is to help women build reliable, polished wardrobes that save mental energy and build confidence in rooms where it matters most.

Articles: 226